ao link
Filter content by area of interest
Handling Equipment/Systems
Ports & Terminals
Transport & Distribution
Materials & Commodities
Storage
Processing
ICT & Telecoms
Civil Engineering
Mining
Environment
Safety & Security
Business
 View all Topics View all Topics A-Z
More View all Topics View all Topics A-Z

You are viewing this article with our compliments. 


register  or  login  to manage your newsletter preferences and to prevent this message from appearing.

Assessing disruption in Brazil’s iron ore exports

In the early hours of 22 April 2021, Brazilian mining giant Vale was ordered to temporary suspend shipping activities at the country’s Guaiba Island terminal, a dedicated iron ore export terminal.

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Assessing disruption in Brazil’s iron ore exports

Later that day, the hurdle was cleared, and activities could resume. Should the market worry when Brazil’s iron ore exports are disrupted? That all depends on the terminal, according to shipping association Bimco.

 

Ilha Guaiba accounts for 7% of seaborne Brazilian iron ore exports. During February and March respectively, 11 and eight Capesize ships departed the terminal, carrying an average of 220,000t of iron ore.

 

According to Oceanbolt, all but one of them headed for China and disruption at Guaiba Island terminal should not cause too much worry.

 

Three months earlier however, on 14 January, a fire broke out at the southern berth of Brazil’s Ponta Da Madeira terminal (PDM), Pier No. 4.

 

The fire had the potential to halt a quarter of all exports from the terminal if the entire Pier No. 4 had been forced to close, since the pier exports twice the amount of the Ilha Guaiba terminal.

 

Disruption at any part of Brazil’s key northern Ponta Da Madeira terminal should therefore most certainly be worrying, according to Bimco.

 

“12.5% of global seaborne iron ore exports is shipped out of Ponta Da Madeira, amounting to 55% of all Brazilian iron ore,” said Peter Sand, the shipping association’s chief shipping analyst. “Fortunately, the port has three piers, five berths and eight shiploaders. Only one loader was damaged in the fire.

 

“Still, exports from the damaged southern berth stopped for 18 days and exclusively using the second shiploader at the berth was not an option,” he added.

 

Due to the low season, disruptions to the world’s most important dry bulk trade were limited, but the potential upheaval was clear and present. Surely, this will not be last scare from Brazilian iron ore operations.

 

Bimco expects the first four months of iron exports out of Brazil to be up by 14.4% compared with the same period in 2020, as April exports are expected to be flat following a 20.1% surge in Q1.

 

As is the case for the entire dry bulk market, China’s dominance as importer is also clear when it comes to Brazilian iron ore exports. In 2020, China grew its share of global iron ore imports to 72.6% from 56.8% in 2017. During 2019 and 2020, the percentage of Chinese iron ore imports were particularly strong as overall exports fell, while the Chinese share of it continued to rise.

 

Malaysia comes in second place, accounting for 7% of global iron ore exports, while the Netherlands is the biggest non-Asian destination with a share of 3%.

 

“It is lifeblood to the Capesize dry bulk market that Brazilian iron ore exports to Asia keep rising,” said Sand. “For the whole market, it is a lever which often decides the profitability of it.

 

“The current strength of the Capesize market, with freight rates reaching US$35,347 per day on Monday, is closely linked to the strong performing Brazilian iron ore exports so far this year,” he concluded.

 

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard

You may also like these related articles...

IoS-OP utilised in newbuild bulk carrier

Record-breaking Capesize dry bulk earnings

Canada’s CP and CN railroads battle for KCS

First Handysize 38 FFA trades by SSY Futures

Imperial divests South American shipping business

BAMIN wins bid to operate FIOL railway in Brazil

Linked In
Twitter